BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//University of California\, Berkeley//UCB Events Calendar//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/Los_Angeles
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0700
TZOFFSETTO:-0800
DTSTART:19701029T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=11;BYDAY=1SU
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:19700402T020000
TZOFFSETFROM:-0800
TZOFFSETTO:-0700
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=2SU
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20180816T053830Z
DTSTART;TZID=America/Los_Angeles:20180822T160000
DTEND;TZID=America/Los_Angeles:20180822T170000
TRANSP:OPAQUE
SUMMARY:Rerandomization and Regression Adjustment
UID:118917-ucb-events-calendar@berkeley.edu
ORGANIZER;CN="UC Berkeley Calendar Network":
LOCATION:1011 Evans Hall
DESCRIPTION:Peng Ding\, UC Berkeley\n\nRandomization is a basis for the statistical inference of treatment effects without assumptions on the outcome generating process. Appropriately using covariates further yields more precise estimators in randomized experiments. In his seminal work Design of Experiments\, R. A. Fisher suggested blocking on discrete covariates in the design stage and conducting the analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) in the analysis stage. In fact\, we can embed blocking into a wider class of experimental design called rerandomization\, and extend the classical ANCOVA to more general regression-adjusted estimators. Rerandomization trumps complete randomization in the design stage\, and regression adjustment trumps the simple difference-in-means estimator in the analysis stage. We argue that practitioners should always consider using a combination of rerandomization and regression adjustment. Under the randomization-inference framework\, we establish a unified theory allowing the designer and analyzer to have access to different sets of covariates. We find that asymptotically (a) for any given estimator with or without regression adjustment\, using rerandomization will never hurt either the sampling precision or the estimated precision\, and (b) for any given design with or without rerandomization\, using our regression-adjusted estimator will never hurt the estimated precision. To theoretically quantify these statements\, we propose two notions of optimal regression-adjusted estimators and measure the additional gains of the designer and analyzer based on the sampling precision and estimated precision. This is a joint work with Xinran Li.
URL:http://events.berkeley.edu/index.php/calendar/sn/pubaff.html?event_ID=118917&view=preview
SEQUENCE:0
CLASS:PUBLIC
CREATED:20180816T053830Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20180816T053830Z
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-BUSYSTATUS:BUSY
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-INSTTYPE:0
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-IMPORTANCE:1
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-OWNERAPPTID:-1
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR