Seminar 217, Risk Management: Proliferation of Anomalies and Zoo of Factors What does the HansenJagannathan Distance Tell Us?
Seminar | October 23 | 11 a.m.-12:30 p.m. | 1011 Evans Hall
Speaker: Xiang Zhang, SWUFE
Recent research finds that prominent asset pricing models have mixed success in evaluating the cross-section of anomalies, which highlights proliferation of anomalies and zoo of factors. In this paper, I investigate that how is the relative pricing performance of these models to explain anomalies, when comparing their misspecification errors the HansenJagannathan (HJ) distance measure. I find that a traded-factor model dominates others in a specific anomaly by incorporating the multiple HJ distance comparing inference. However, different from the current research of Barillas and Shanken (2017) and Barillas, Kan, Robotti and Shanken (2018), I result that the HJ distance is a general statistic measure to compare models and some model-derived non-traded factors even outperform traded factors. Second, there is a large variation in the shape and curvature of these confidence sets of anomalies, which makes any single SDF difficult to satisfy confidence sets of anomalies all. My results imply that further work is required not only in pruning the number of priced factors but also in building models that explain the anomalies better.